🔗 Share this article

The Australian bold action to ban social media access for young people below 16 is creating waves worldwide. Lawmakers, campaigners, and guardians are watching intently to see if this tactic will become a template for other nations.

European Trend

Throughout Europe, a increasing number of states are exploring parallel measures.

• The Danish government plans a prohibition on social media for under-15s, with the PM declaring that mobile devices and platforms are "robbing our youngsters' youth". Legislation is expected to be formalized soon.
• Norway is set to implement a minimum age limit of 15, pointing to the need to safeguard children from the "influence of the recommendation systems".
• Ireland is developing a digital wallet to authenticate the identity and age of social media users. Officials have indicated that an Australian-model ban is "one of the tools in reserve".
• In Spain, the prime minister has called on lawmakers to enact a law raising the minimum age for joining social media to 16.
• In France, the head of state has proposed a ban for under-15s, and a parliamentary commission has recommended a related action, alongside an overnight "screen time restriction" for older teenagers.
• The government in The Netherlands has recommended guardians to restrict their kids from social media before 15.

Across the European Union, the EU parliament has passed a symbolic motion demanding a ban for teenagers under 16 unless guardian approval is granted. While it cautions of the "compulsive" nature of these services, the resolution does not create binding law.

"A clear age limit is a solid starting point," commented one MEP driving the resolution.

Britain: A Cautious Eye

In the UK, the leadership has not ruled out a future ban, emphasizing that "no option is being dismissed" but stressing any policy must be "grounded in conclusive evidence".

Previously, support gathered behind a bill to enact restrictions on social media use by minors, but it was eventually watered down. Instead, the government committed to conduct more studies the issue.

Campaign organizations have voiced warnings. A prominent charity set up by the loved ones of a young person who died after encountering harmful platform posts contends that a blanket age ban could fail to improve online safety and could lead to a "sudden drop-off" of exposure when users reach the legal age.

"Australia's ban is a reaction to the inability of the social media companies to design tools that are safe and suitable for children," stated a leading online safety campaigner.

America: A Decentralized Approach

In the United States, action is primarily occurring at the state level against a backdrop of country-wide inaction.

• Utah mandates adult approval for under-18s to use social media and restricts overnight use.
• The state of Florida has enacted a bill barring those below 14 from creating accounts on social media, though it is entangled in legal challenges.
• The state of Virginia has enacted a regulation limiting minors to 60 minutes of social media use per day, with extra time dependent on a guardian's okay.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have likewise passed bills requiring parental consent for teenagers to open social media accounts.

Despite bipartisan support and proposals from certain individuals to follow this example, a federal ban is presently seen as a distant prospect.

International Perspectives

Beyond Europe and the US, other countries are also considering moves.

• Malaysia plans to prohibit social media for those under sixteen beginning next year.
• Brazil has increased the access age for the platform Instagram to 16.

Yet, global bodies strike a more cautious tone. A major UN agency has advised that age-based restrictions carry risks and "might backfire". The body highlights that social networks can be a "lifeline" for vulnerable youth and that government action should not be a "substitute" for tech companies to improve safety.

Even as this worldwide debate unfolds, the actions of the Australian government and several other countries show that policymakers internationally are no longer prepared to delay for tech companies to self-regulate.