🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people laid to rest in resting places vulnerable to shoreline retreat argue that indecision on how best to address the problem is causing them unnecessary distress about the final resting places of their loved ones.

An Impending Threat to Historic Graveyards

The council have singled out three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being swallowed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the situation details a series of options, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and reburying them in more secure locations. Officials maintain it is for local people to decide how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. My parents intended this to be their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates suggest at least a portion of one graveyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Past

A local business owner recalled a school trip to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the water, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get carried away to sea. That is not the case. People will take bones as mementos and go plundering graves looking for valuables. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the same thing that happened at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Along the coast lies the grave of a ex-soldier killed while working overseas. His parent said she lost sleep after learning her son’s grave might one day be relocated.

“It does disturb me to think this may not remain his lasting home,” she said. “For us it’s an significant place to go.”

In her view, new interments should cease but says it is too soon to exhume existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Searching for Answers and Certainty

An absence of consensus over the timing and method to handle the challenge has resulted in bereaved families feeling exasperated and worried.

Some want more coastal protections to delay the unavoidable loss and to allow burials to proceed for now. Others contend the time for relocation is approaching.

“The situation is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And everybody is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager confirmed the burial sites were owned and managed of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is up to them to choose the path to take. Our role is here to help support them through that process with communities.”

It was also stated there was time to weigh all the choices. “This concerns decades before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should happen yet. It requires good local conversations to discover the appropriate solutions for each community.”

The prospect of losing the historic sites was labeled one of “immense sadness for the local community,” but faith leaders also spoke of a doctrine in resurrection, providing a spiritual perspective on the temporal disappearance of hallowed earth.